Political News or Comments

I have a question that I may understand the answer to in part; but I hope there is another here who will see something that I miss, and would be kind enough to help me understand this fickle web that I continue to piece together.

I have had a fair life, I think, all things considered. Some wrongs have been done to me, as I have done some wrong. I find myself more and more in a personal battle with contradictory, yet similarly complimentary aspects of myself. I don't know if it's natural; in entirety to want to believe myself good in nature. I know that in myself is a force that is activated within the opportunity to help another, a fundamental impulse to save life, or assist some of those in need. But I also recognize the existence of a monster that wants to destroy and harm. A force of darkness, so to speak, that would rather consume and exist in malice. I would intuitively assume that balance would be the answer, but I still find myself in question of the purpose, and spiritual implications of my decisions and of what gray area I would be classified within. Am I a mostly good, bad person?

I find myself incredibly relieved with the use of this plant, but maybe to the point of inebriation as compared to medication. I find it not only a crutch, but an escape; and this pattern is all too prevalent to me as it has been for the better part of my life. I suppose I think that in order to ask for wisdom, or intellect, one must also deliver something of value. These are things that are hard for me to face within myself, as I continue to process the psychology of my most fundamental motives.  As I ask this question, I ask for the purpose of curiosity of control, economy, and the mis-represented image of this ancient plant.


As it pertains to Marijuana, it has been incredibly beneficial for me. But, as I spoke before it has been as damaging as healing as most things seem to be. It has probably been discussed the continued legalization of marijuana throughout America, and the medical acknowledgement of it's value. This is where I arrive at my fundamental question: If little happened that hasn't been initiated; pertaining to legislature, and media, why would the pharmaceutical companies allow for it's legalization if it might eliminate the necessity for so many pills?

You seem to have a good grasp on personal marijuana use.
The legalization in the US has been in the works for some time.
I believe it is part of the plan to subjugate the nation for its planned seventh place ranking in the NWO.

I see another collection of goons have been assembled for the new Us DRama called "Choose your masque" all compromised nodding heads



Larry Sinclair (pictured in the photoshopped image) is a gay prostitute who had two homosexual encounters and cocaine with Barack Obama in 1999.

In June 2008, Sinclair was arrested at the end of the press conference he gave to the National Press Club by US marshals and Washington DC police on an old Delaware warrant. Joe Biden's recently deceased (May 2015) son Beau was Attorney General of Delaware at the time. Sinclair spent a week or more in jail, and the warrant ended up being dismissed. Maybe it was an old parking ticket or library fine....

Other things aside, politicians are selected for their ability to be compromised - their vices and thus susceptibility to blackmail. Whether it's gay sex and drugs like Obama (and Bush Jr., for that matter), paedophilia, sex, murder, money, Satanism, whatever. While Sinclair was dealt with like a political dissident in a Second World country, and the media coverage of the matter was brief and in favour of the now president, you'd find that if Obama were to rock the boat much in terms of doing as he's told ... Larry Sinclair would overnight become front page news. That's how these goons are kept under control.

Obama bides his time til a post as secretary general of the uN is up for appointment or whatever is done for leadership in Geneva / NY. A US presidency means much less to th international community in terms of self determination of a free and humane representation of individuals practicing such. Hardly even admired in passing since so much emphisis is on the collective(s) .
ButroseButrouse Galli sponsered the Lega;lize WEED in my part of the lower 48. when time was up to return signatures, my district somehow for untold reason was excluded. There are more agriculture workers and businesses here than any where else in the state that stood to gain in industrial applications of the nefarious substance. BB Galli and Barack Hussein Soetarobama share much in common goals, so it seems. Which gives a little wiggle room to mention how clear all of the grimy slick crime is getting along so well rewarding behaviors with the flavor of Billy Benji and George's desired preconcoction of controlled takedown of the America $$ that still has SOME use if anybody in the camp that knows the NWO agenda gets up the guts to cut the checks. Ukraine had P l e nty of these from Poland. They got paid though
Meanwhile, Biden hawks a butt buddy from the podium while his other son brings in the bacon for the IMF and his boss

How long will the "good men" and "ladies" near the top allow this corrupt to be contained , if there are any left that is , in all the technological nations
Doctor David Kelly was the UK’s leading biological and chemical warfare expert; a genius level scientist who was employed by the Government’s Porton Down laboratories in Wiltshire, England.
He had been a weapons inspector in Iraq, tasked with searching for evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Sadam Hussein’s kingdom. He had been on over 30 visits to Iraq to inspect weapons munitions in Iraq and was scheduled to go again in shortly. Unfortunately, he had gone missing from his home in Oxfordshire countryside.
Two days earlier, he had been summoned to Parliament to be questioned about what he had apparently told a BBC journalist. He had told the journalist something in confidence and he did not give permission for his information to be credited to him; for his own safety he had insisted on complete confidentiality and obviously fully expected the journalists that he spoke to, to keep his information confidential, because it was highly controversial; he had stated that in his expert opinion, there were No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
He would have been the one most likely to know, and he insisted that the idea that Sadam Hussein had weapons that he could release on the world within 45 minutes was a fallacy and wholly inaccurate. That meant, in his expert opinion, that the reason given by the government to need to invade Iraq, was also a fallacy. In other words, they did not have a legitimate reason for claiming they needed to invade Iraq to stop Sadam using the weapons; as there were no weapons of this calibre.
This information was released by the BBC and astonishingly they went on to give his name as the source who had told them. When his name was given as the person who disagreed with the government’s claim that there were these weapons, he was summoned before Parliament to explain himself, and then taken to a private meeting with the British intelligence Service.
The day that he went missing, he had been working from home as he often did, and he went out for one of his regular walks. He would often work in his home office, and then take a walk at around 3pm in the woods near his home. It was Thursday July 17th 2003. That morning he had been arranging a trip to Iraq, to leave in a few days’ time. He had also arranged to see his daughter in the evening.
By midnight he still hadn’t returned, and his wife, Janice, called the police. They brought in police heat-seeking helicopters to hover over the woods to try to spot him. It was not until the next morning however that a man and woman out walking their dog found Dr Kelly, lying dead against a tree. They could see that there was a cut to his left wrist and a packet of painkillers with just one tablet left in them beside him.
In 2008, Freedom of Information requests revealed that the helicopters had flown over the exact spot where he had been found, yet it had not spotted him there. At his autopsy his death was determined to have occurred between around 4pm and 1 am on the day he went missing, with the latest possible time that he had died being determined to be 1.15 am.
Why had the helicopters not seen him there? If he had died at the latest at just after 1am, they would have seen his body there. Or, had he died elsewhere? If he had not died at the spot, he could not have possibly taken himself to the spot once dead. Had he been killed somewhere else and then taken there?
The year before this, in 2007, the Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker also made a Freedom of Information Request to access the full details of his death, and it was revealed that neither the knife nor the packet of painkillers had any of the Doctor’s fingerprints on them.
There were also no gloves near him or on his hands. How then had he killed himself with the painkillers and knife? There was also the Hutton Inquiry, a non-statutory review which blamed the BBC for its breach of confidentiality in the matter, and which cited the cause of death as ruled in the autopsy as caused by cutting his wrist, leading to haemorrhage. However, witnesses at the scene where he was found included two highly experienced paramedics.
In contrast to the dog walkers’ statements that he was found against the tree, David Bartlet, one of the paramedics, said his body was laying flat on the grass and away from the tree by some distance. In fact, because of the position of the body, he made the comment to his fellow paramedic that it looked like he could have fallen out of a tree. Had he been moved then?
That wasn’t the only discrepancy in the eye witness accounts. David and his colleague, Vanessa Hunt, both explicitly stated that they were surprised by just how little blood was at the scene. They had both been to many suicides before this one and both of them knew without any doubt that when someone cut their wrists, the arterial spray was extreme and blood gushed out everywhere.
“There was no gaping wound; there wasn’t even a puddle of blood,” Hunt said Not only that, but despite there being a blister packet of thirty tablets, all but one had gone from the packet and yet in the man’s stomach was only evidence of him having taken 2 tablets. Where had the other 27 tablets gone if they weren’t inside him? They were not found by him, or anywhere nearby. They were never found.
Clearly, someone had wanted it to look like he had committed suicide, but the wound to just one of his wrists was a superficial cut only, no-where near serious enough cut to have cut an artery, and again, there was hardly any blood. He simply couldn’t have died from bleeding to death, and he had not died of an overdose because he had only swallowed two painkillers; but someone had left a near empty packet by his body to imply that he had swallowed a whole packet of tablets.
Then there was the curious incident at the Police Headquarters, where a case file was created at 2.30 pm on the day of his disappearance. It was for the missing man; the only problem was, he had not yet been reported as missing. In fact, he hadn’t even left his home to go for his walk at that time, and it was to be nine and a half hours before he was actually reported missing by his wife.
In the file, at 9 am the next day an entry read, “Body recovered.” No-one had recovered his body or even seen it yet at that time.
In 2011, a group of Doctors appealed for an official inquiry to be carried out into his controversial death.
They are still waiting.
-From "UNEXPLAINED DEATHS OF THE SINISTER KIND" by David McGown
http://www.amazon.com/UNEXPLAINED-DEATHS-SINIS…/…/B00XT518RW

yeehaa