Pic of the Day

Modesty or even inadequate representation of the complete jigsaw forbids me posting an image of my personal preferred style of femme breast ....that may seize my attentions on occasions
Nipple shape and texture in addition to the mound geometry all come in to play so to say, as does the complete package animal body , legs, face etc attached to those items, especially the face initially.
Movement , gesture and verbal expression also has impact as does the dynamic thought (or lack of) exhibited by the psychic vessel that moves the animal

Much of the above is processed and confirmed as magnetically attractive or otherwise to every femme i behold = before i even begin to consciously consider the whys
Then when an encountered subject is coming through as actively attractive to the consciousness, and these whys ? start kicking in, it is at that stage that i do interfere with my own potential future with another, as each thought on the subject leads to an action or non-action that does attract or repel the possibility and even the reality of progress in relating
And as i consider this stage of whys , its absolute power to make or break any potential relating during the initial tentative relating or even before any actual real relating gets underway
i simultaneously wonder what other people do
or indeed, do they just more do and less why or something like that , im not really sure how things go for others

Reply to my Reply (:

When people ask themselves Why ? about anything , who exactly are they asking this too ?
This must tie in to their very own subliminal belief in something beyond (the god principle) in addition to just taking stock of the situation and scanning their own memory and experience banks
Or if they a full practising christian etc , they are actually asking god as they believe it to be

But then the answer that comes back to that why , may be varied and flexible or even direct to the point where immediate action is demanded , and that very answer may just be completly influenced by the self but using an idea of god to take some of the responsibility of its actions

The answer could then be broken down into 2 states, is it pessimistic or is it optimistic which themselves can be states which are impulsively superimposed onto any event , should the subject suddenly be inspired by some deeper faith or spirit movement which can jolt like a battery charger , the existing status quo of mood into something more exceptional although temporary

therefore the conclusion to the source of the question why ? when asked by the self , can certainly be said to come out of the self , but that self itself has a myriad of complex psychic roots which may indeed penetrate into other realms of influence not yet scientifically rationally logically proveable which still even in this day and age ties into the ancient hindu mystic conclusion about the source of the god aspect , that it is certainly out there contained in things like the vedas , but that rational and logic are about as far away from understanding what it is and where it comes from , as one can get , because according to some hindu mystic writings , to attempt to understand the spirit aspect by rational or logic is just a vague pornographic generalisation misrepresentation at best and offers no possibility of understanding the spiritual roots that penetrate into and out of being

So now i think , why do i ask why , and the conclusion is , that it is the first stage of understanding , but not the understanding itself , which always comes later after the experience

Its been a while since ive gone off on one of these irational binges - cheers qsc, every single comment may have strange unpredicatable consequences

re: too many assholes. And God was playing dirty tricks on us.

Good essay on nihilism worth reading I think.

20 Greatest Lies of Nihilism

i dont see what i should be seeing.

what am i looking at?

re: Flames posted an image from Turkey

Flames, do you see that Turk standing in the middle of that crowd of angry Turks,
about a third of the way back towards the right who looks just a bit upset? I think
I know him.

re: hate

Ultimately, for reasons she can't grasp or come to terms with, she hates
herself.

"You become that what you hate." --Zohar

re: people are fucking hopeless; the "fuck 'em" useless

People don't know who they are. Everything has been stripped out of them; there
is nothing remaining anymore, their spirit has been stripped from its temporal body.

They are chunks of property in commerce. They are bought and sold like physical
property spending their entire lives consuming and forfeiting that energy for the
entities that have placed who they should be into their minds.

I never thought I would actually mean this: fuck 'em. They aren't worth the energy.

The focus is and always should be: who are you? If you lose sight of this fact then
I will be saying the same thing about you: "fuck 'em."

Who are you? There can be no other option. You either get it or you don't. It is so
easy to see that it goes right over the "fuck 'em" group's head.

Who are you? What will you discover about yourself today that you never knew or
weren't cognizant of until today?

Then, if you do discover who you are, don't ever "get fooled again."

re: image above

As soon as the human brain is interfaced with the chip then I guess
that image will become all the more apparent.

The Sexual organs have been made obsolete - they get in the way of Totauthoritarian corporate philosophy

re: molten radioactive core at Chernobyl

Impressive. To think what men create doesn't always come out as
planned does it?

Wonder what the interior of the cores in Fukushima are turning
about to be. Problem there is nobody will be left alive to even send
a remote camera in to take a few images for posterity.

re: Kissinger; pic of the day thread

I know this is the pick of the day thread but can I put this here because
it is relevant to Henry Kissinger who I was looking at yesterday

I was pulling at various strands looking at the U.S. State Department's
Intelligence wing which I did not know existed. How many America's knew
that the U.S. State Department has an "intelligence bureau?"

Greg Theilmann spent seven years at the State Department's Intelligence
Bureau. The current head of the State Department's Intelligence Bureau is
Philip S. Goldberg. From 1994 to 1996 Philip S. Goldberg served as the State
Department's Desk Officer for Bosnia and a Special Assistant to Ambassador
Richard Holbrooke (Jewish ancestry). Holbrooke cut his teeth at the Agency
for International Development. The is a euphemism for either come up to
our standards and cooperate with us or your country gets destabilized.

Bureau of Intelligence and Research

Philip S. Goldberg

Can all these intelligence agencies in the U.S. set up other intelligence
agencies to cover up their own activities to protect their own bureaucracies
and budgets? Are these intelligence agencies providing "intel" to private
equity firms to garnish economic favoritism re: Kissinger & Associates? Philip
S. Goldberg knows Richard Holbrooke and Holbrooke works for Kissinger &
Associates.

Richard Holbrooke - A Zionist Running The War In Afghanistan

Robert D. Blackwill (now senior fellow at the RAND Corp) is the Henry A.
Kissinger Senior Fellow for U.S. Foreign Policy at the Council on Foreign
Relations. Robert D. Blackwill and Richard Holbrooke know each other from
being at Kissinger & Associates together.

Now, read (of course I don't expect anyone to read this but I have) his
report by Robert D. Blackwill which states that the most important
relationship between the US and Israel is energy especially natural gas.

Israel: A Strategic Asset for the United States

Holbrooke cut his teeth at the Agency
for International Development. The is a euphemism for either come up to
our standards and cooperate with us or your country gets destabilized.

good one TG

Well said , but did anyone care , not publicly anyway, no newspapers investigating the clandestine causes of last centuries and this centuries wars