Green energy Products - Fact or another money making fIction

Tuesday December 20, 2011
BRUSSELS (AP) -- Europe’s main weapon in the battle against climate change is now fighting for its own survival.

In early January, investors in the continent’s cap-and-trade system still had to pay some 14 euro ($18.30) for the right to emit one ton of carbon dioxide into the air. By last week, the price of one emission allowance had tumbled to a meager 6.41 euro -- making it much cheaper to pollute and slashing the financial incentives for companies to invest in low-carbon technologies.

Analysts warn that the prospect of another recession in the debt-ridden continent, and the accompanying decline in emissions, could push prices below 2 euro by the end of next month.

The troubles in the carbon market, a system being watched closely from California to China, is linked to the struggles of Europe’ other ambitious project, the euro. And just as financial investors have looked to the European Central Bank to save the currency through massive intervention in the bond markets, analysts say the emissions market may need similar centralized help.

Last week, 19 companies, including oil giant Royal Dutch Shell PLC, Philips Electronics NV and supermarket chain Tesco PLC, sent a letter to the European Commission urging it to reduce the number of emission allowances in the system and figure out how to protect the market from future economic shocks. The commission and national governments jointly manage thecap-and-trade system.
Undermining development

"The lower price is really undermining the development of technologies that will be needed in the decades to come," said David Hone, Shell’s climate change adviser.

Shell, which is mostly known for selling oil and gas, has been one of the pioneers of carbon capture and storage, projects in which CO2 emissions are stored underground so they don’t get released into the atmosphere and contribute to global warming. But investing in new technologies like carbon capture and storage only becomes commercially viable at a carbon price of between 25 and 30 euro, Hone said.

"Over the last few months, we have seen some of these projects disappear," he added.

In October, the U.K.government shut down the carbon capture project in Longannet in eastern Scotland in which Shell was one of the partners.

While the prospect of another recession is the main reason for the recent drop in carbon prices, experts say that -- just like with the euro -- serious flaws in the system are exacerbating the problems and could lead to its failure if they can’t be fixed.

The economic crisis has lowered emissions and thus hit the price of carbon allowances. But the drop has been so dramatic because there were too many allowances in the system to begin with.

To get industry and skeptical governments on board, the Commission set a very high cap for emissions when it launched the carbon market in 2005.

Since then, most allowances have been given out for free to the 11,000 power stations and factories covered by the system based on their historical emissions. Companies that emit less carbon dioxide than they are allowed can sell their spare permits to firms that exceed their limit. As of next year, airlines will also be included in the system.

But the big test for Europe’s carbon market -- and whether it can provide the financial incentives for cutting emissions -- will come in 2013, when governments start selling a growing number of allowances at auctions.

It is before then that the Commission has to intervene, say the companies that wrote last week’s letters.

There are signs that their calls are being heard.

On Tuesday, the environment committee of the European Parliament voted to withdraw some 1.4 billion allowances, about 15 percent of the total, from the carbon market between 2013 and 2020. At the same time, the committee said, the annual cap should be cut by 2.25 percent per year, rather than the 1.74 percent currently planned.

While the committee vote is the first step in a long process of changing the system and few industry watchers expect the figures to survive negotiations among EU states trying to protect their national industries, it caused carbon prices to jump more than 18 percent.

"It opens up a much deeper discussion about what does the intervention look like and when is it going to happen," says Sanjeev Kumar, an expert on carbon trading at environmental watchdog E3G in Brussels.

"Without intervention," warned Kumar, "not only the ETS is over, but Europe’s climate policy is over. It will put Europe back into the dark ages."

Apart from failing to encourage the necessary cuts in emissions and technological innovation, the collapse in the carbon price could also worsen Europe’s debt crisis.

Between 2013 and 2020, when companies have to pay for more and more of their allowances, the cap-and-tade system could raise as much as 190 billion euro for governments across the EU if prices recover.

"This is a pretty important revenue stream for most member states," says Rob Elsworth, of climate campaign group Sandbag in London. "And they are watching revenues just disappear."

Experts like Kumar and Elsworth are hopeful that states will garner the political will to save the carbon trading system, which has pioneered the market-based approach to saving the environment.
"If you take away this green-economy narrative," asked Elsworth, "what’s really left of Europe?"

"If you take away this green-economy narrative," asked Elsworth, "what’s really left of Europe?"

The UK’s green investment bank, which aims to kickstart investments in low carbon technologies, will be located in both Edinburgh and London, Vince Cable, the business secretary has announced.
The bank’s headquarters will be in the Scottish capital Edinburgh, while its main transaction team will be based in London.

The government has pledged £3bn for the bank [Green Investment Bank] initially, which will lend to businesses wanting to invest in renewable energy projects such as wind farms. [Nick Clegg's wife is deeply involved in Spanish companies that manufacturer the wind turbines that Scotland and the British have been purchasing; wind farms: what a blight on humanity]

Nick Clegg [his wife is Miriam Clegg] has previously said that he hopes the taxpayer will front up to £15bn of lending in the long-term, with Vince Cable's department claiming that up to £200bn [that is an enormous sum of money; what bank/s will hold the bonds on that enormous amount of money; who gets stuck paying off the bonds regardless or not if the damn wind turbines even function?] needs to be spent on green technologies overall by the end of the decade.

The establishment of the bank comes despite rumblings within the Cabinet - particularly from George Osborne [Osborne, Clegg, Johnson; Cameron are all buddies from Oxford and the Bullingdon Club; who got extorted and is Osborne running opposition to appease the Lords in the House and their plebeian mud hut dwellers exhaling too much Co2] - about how much taxpayer subsidy should be pumped into renewables. The resignation of Chris Huhne [Huhne resigned after allegations of a speeding cover-up; his ex-wife Vicky Pryce is a real piece of work; she was at KPMG involved in abusive tax shelters related to the financial events of 9/11; it is also alleged she is the illegitimate daughter of Prince Philip being born in Greece where Prince Philip was at while in the Royal Navy in 1951; Vicky Price was born in 1952 and Prince Philip himself was born into a Greek Royal family] last month was greeted with dismay by environmentalists, who feared it would lead to the coalition easing back on previous climate change pledges. [they are too committed to 'global warming' and couldn't possibly face defeat and loose face on the complete fabrication and falsity of the science]

Scotland: A Winning Bet?

Salmond says he wants to keep the queen as head of state of an independent Scotland

There is no moral issue