We are Divine Beings
+3
tgII
Sputnik
Blackbird
7 posters
Page 1 of 1
nice
Sputnik- Posts : 1039
Join date : 2009-11-18
Location : Isaiah 14:11-15
Re: We are Divine Beings
tgII Thu 28 Jun 2012, 23:45
So much for being 'divine beings'; genes from three parents.
It won't be long now.
Who is Professor Jacques Cohen?
What is Galileo Research Laboratories, LLC?
It is a private corporation and 'modified babies' will become a business.
Divinity is being stripped from us one genetic experiment after another.
It won't be long now.
Who is Professor Jacques Cohen?
What is Galileo Research Laboratories, LLC?
Jacques Cohen, PhD. is the founder and president of Galileo Research Laboratories, LLC. Dr. Cohen has served as the Scientific Director of Assisted Reproduction at the Institute for Reproductive Medicine and Science at Saint Barnabas Medical Center in Livingston, New Jersey since 1995 and is associated with several laboratories involved in IVF and PGD, both in Europe and throughout the US.
It is a private corporation and 'modified babies' will become a business.
Divinity is being stripped from us one genetic experiment after another.
tgII- Posts : 2431
Join date : 2009-11-17
Re: We are Divine Beings
KapitanScarlet Fri 29 Jun 2012, 01:16
Dolly the sheep was a long time back , lord knows whats been created in the island or underground labs today
Anyone given thought to the possibility that blair , cameron bush, hil clinton, and the arab league leaders are actually LAB-Adjusted before they get the nod for the seat of powerful decision making as directed to them
Anyone given thought to the possibility that blair , cameron bush, hil clinton, and the arab league leaders are actually LAB-Adjusted before they get the nod for the seat of powerful decision making as directed to them
KapitanScarlet- Admin
- Posts : 3293
Join date : 2009-11-16 -
highnoon- Posts : 567
Join date : 2009-11-18
Age : 38
Re: We are Divine Beings
KapitanScarlet Sat 15 Aug 2015, 11:47
Certainly not all
Doctor David Kelly was the UK’s leading biological and chemical warfare expert; a genius level scientist who was employed by the Government’s Porton Down laboratories in Wiltshire, England.
He had been a weapons inspector in Iraq, tasked with searching for evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Sadam Hussein’s kingdom. He had been on over 30 visits to Iraq to inspect weapons munitions in Iraq and was scheduled to go again in shortly. Unfortunately, he had gone missing from his home in Oxfordshire countryside.
Two days earlier, he had been summoned to Parliament to be questioned about what he had apparently told a BBC journalist. He had told the journalist something in confidence and he did not give permission for his information to be credited to him; for his own safety he had insisted on complete confidentiality and obviously fully expected the journalists that he spoke to, to keep his information confidential, because it was highly controversial; he had stated that in his expert opinion, there were No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
He would have been the one most likely to know, and he insisted that the idea that Sadam Hussein had weapons that he could release on the world within 45 minutes was a fallacy and wholly inaccurate. That meant, in his expert opinion, that the reason given by the government to need to invade Iraq, was also a fallacy. In other words, they did not have a legitimate reason for claiming they needed to invade Iraq to stop Sadam using the weapons; as there were no weapons of this calibre.
This information was released by the BBC and astonishingly they went on to give his name as the source who had told them. When his name was given as the person who disagreed with the government’s claim that there were these weapons, he was summoned before Parliament to explain himself, and then taken to a private meeting with the British intelligence Service.
The day that he went missing, he had been working from home as he often did, and he went out for one of his regular walks. He would often work in his home office, and then take a walk at around 3pm in the woods near his home. It was Thursday July 17th 2003. That morning he had been arranging a trip to Iraq, to leave in a few days’ time. He had also arranged to see his daughter in the evening.
By midnight he still hadn’t returned, and his wife, Janice, called the police. They brought in police heat-seeking helicopters to hover over the woods to try to spot him. It was not until the next morning however that a man and woman out walking their dog found Dr Kelly, lying dead against a tree. They could see that there was a cut to his left wrist and a packet of painkillers with just one tablet left in them beside him.
In 2008, Freedom of Information requests revealed that the helicopters had flown over the exact spot where he had been found, yet it had not spotted him there. At his autopsy his death was determined to have occurred between around 4pm and 1 am on the day he went missing, with the latest possible time that he had died being determined to be 1.15 am.
Why had the helicopters not seen him there? If he had died at the latest at just after 1am, they would have seen his body there. Or, had he died elsewhere? If he had not died at the spot, he could not have possibly taken himself to the spot once dead. Had he been killed somewhere else and then taken there?
The year before this, in 2007, the Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker also made a Freedom of Information Request to access the full details of his death, and it was revealed that neither the knife nor the packet of painkillers had any of the Doctor’s fingerprints on them.
There were also no gloves near him or on his hands. How then had he killed himself with the painkillers and knife? There was also the Hutton Inquiry, a non-statutory review which blamed the BBC for its breach of confidentiality in the matter, and which cited the cause of death as ruled in the autopsy as caused by cutting his wrist, leading to haemorrhage. However, witnesses at the scene where he was found included two highly experienced paramedics.
In contrast to the dog walkers’ statements that he was found against the tree, David Bartlet, one of the paramedics, said his body was laying flat on the grass and away from the tree by some distance. In fact, because of the position of the body, he made the comment to his fellow paramedic that it looked like he could have fallen out of a tree. Had he been moved then?
That wasn’t the only discrepancy in the eye witness accounts. David and his colleague, Vanessa Hunt, both explicitly stated that they were surprised by just how little blood was at the scene. They had both been to many suicides before this one and both of them knew without any doubt that when someone cut their wrists, the arterial spray was extreme and blood gushed out everywhere.
“There was no gaping wound; there wasn’t even a puddle of blood,” Hunt said Not only that, but despite there being a blister packet of thirty tablets, all but one had gone from the packet and yet in the man’s stomach was only evidence of him having taken 2 tablets. Where had the other 27 tablets gone if they weren’t inside him? They were not found by him, or anywhere nearby. They were never found.
Clearly, someone had wanted it to look like he had committed suicide, but the wound to just one of his wrists was a superficial cut only, no-where near serious enough cut to have cut an artery, and again, there was hardly any blood. He simply couldn’t have died from bleeding to death, and he had not died of an overdose because he had only swallowed two painkillers; but someone had left a near empty packet by his body to imply that he had swallowed a whole packet of tablets.
Then there was the curious incident at the Police Headquarters, where a case file was created at 2.30 pm on the day of his disappearance. It was for the missing man; the only problem was, he had not yet been reported as missing. In fact, he hadn’t even left his home to go for his walk at that time, and it was to be nine and a half hours before he was actually reported missing by his wife.
In the file, at 9 am the next day an entry read, “Body recovered.” No-one had recovered his body or even seen it yet at that time.
In 2011, a group of Doctors appealed for an official inquiry to be carried out into his controversial death.
They are still waiting.
-From "UNEXPLAINED DEATHS OF THE SINISTER KIND" by David McGown
http://www.amazon.com/UNEXPLAINED-DEATHS-SINIS…/…/B00XT518RW
Doctor David Kelly was the UK’s leading biological and chemical warfare expert; a genius level scientist who was employed by the Government’s Porton Down laboratories in Wiltshire, England.
He had been a weapons inspector in Iraq, tasked with searching for evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Sadam Hussein’s kingdom. He had been on over 30 visits to Iraq to inspect weapons munitions in Iraq and was scheduled to go again in shortly. Unfortunately, he had gone missing from his home in Oxfordshire countryside.
Two days earlier, he had been summoned to Parliament to be questioned about what he had apparently told a BBC journalist. He had told the journalist something in confidence and he did not give permission for his information to be credited to him; for his own safety he had insisted on complete confidentiality and obviously fully expected the journalists that he spoke to, to keep his information confidential, because it was highly controversial; he had stated that in his expert opinion, there were No weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
He would have been the one most likely to know, and he insisted that the idea that Sadam Hussein had weapons that he could release on the world within 45 minutes was a fallacy and wholly inaccurate. That meant, in his expert opinion, that the reason given by the government to need to invade Iraq, was also a fallacy. In other words, they did not have a legitimate reason for claiming they needed to invade Iraq to stop Sadam using the weapons; as there were no weapons of this calibre.
This information was released by the BBC and astonishingly they went on to give his name as the source who had told them. When his name was given as the person who disagreed with the government’s claim that there were these weapons, he was summoned before Parliament to explain himself, and then taken to a private meeting with the British intelligence Service.
The day that he went missing, he had been working from home as he often did, and he went out for one of his regular walks. He would often work in his home office, and then take a walk at around 3pm in the woods near his home. It was Thursday July 17th 2003. That morning he had been arranging a trip to Iraq, to leave in a few days’ time. He had also arranged to see his daughter in the evening.
By midnight he still hadn’t returned, and his wife, Janice, called the police. They brought in police heat-seeking helicopters to hover over the woods to try to spot him. It was not until the next morning however that a man and woman out walking their dog found Dr Kelly, lying dead against a tree. They could see that there was a cut to his left wrist and a packet of painkillers with just one tablet left in them beside him.
In 2008, Freedom of Information requests revealed that the helicopters had flown over the exact spot where he had been found, yet it had not spotted him there. At his autopsy his death was determined to have occurred between around 4pm and 1 am on the day he went missing, with the latest possible time that he had died being determined to be 1.15 am.
Why had the helicopters not seen him there? If he had died at the latest at just after 1am, they would have seen his body there. Or, had he died elsewhere? If he had not died at the spot, he could not have possibly taken himself to the spot once dead. Had he been killed somewhere else and then taken there?
The year before this, in 2007, the Liberal Democrat MP Norman Baker also made a Freedom of Information Request to access the full details of his death, and it was revealed that neither the knife nor the packet of painkillers had any of the Doctor’s fingerprints on them.
There were also no gloves near him or on his hands. How then had he killed himself with the painkillers and knife? There was also the Hutton Inquiry, a non-statutory review which blamed the BBC for its breach of confidentiality in the matter, and which cited the cause of death as ruled in the autopsy as caused by cutting his wrist, leading to haemorrhage. However, witnesses at the scene where he was found included two highly experienced paramedics.
In contrast to the dog walkers’ statements that he was found against the tree, David Bartlet, one of the paramedics, said his body was laying flat on the grass and away from the tree by some distance. In fact, because of the position of the body, he made the comment to his fellow paramedic that it looked like he could have fallen out of a tree. Had he been moved then?
That wasn’t the only discrepancy in the eye witness accounts. David and his colleague, Vanessa Hunt, both explicitly stated that they were surprised by just how little blood was at the scene. They had both been to many suicides before this one and both of them knew without any doubt that when someone cut their wrists, the arterial spray was extreme and blood gushed out everywhere.
“There was no gaping wound; there wasn’t even a puddle of blood,” Hunt said Not only that, but despite there being a blister packet of thirty tablets, all but one had gone from the packet and yet in the man’s stomach was only evidence of him having taken 2 tablets. Where had the other 27 tablets gone if they weren’t inside him? They were not found by him, or anywhere nearby. They were never found.
Clearly, someone had wanted it to look like he had committed suicide, but the wound to just one of his wrists was a superficial cut only, no-where near serious enough cut to have cut an artery, and again, there was hardly any blood. He simply couldn’t have died from bleeding to death, and he had not died of an overdose because he had only swallowed two painkillers; but someone had left a near empty packet by his body to imply that he had swallowed a whole packet of tablets.
Then there was the curious incident at the Police Headquarters, where a case file was created at 2.30 pm on the day of his disappearance. It was for the missing man; the only problem was, he had not yet been reported as missing. In fact, he hadn’t even left his home to go for his walk at that time, and it was to be nine and a half hours before he was actually reported missing by his wife.
In the file, at 9 am the next day an entry read, “Body recovered.” No-one had recovered his body or even seen it yet at that time.
In 2011, a group of Doctors appealed for an official inquiry to be carried out into his controversial death.
They are still waiting.
-From "UNEXPLAINED DEATHS OF THE SINISTER KIND" by David McGown
http://www.amazon.com/UNEXPLAINED-DEATHS-SINIS…/…/B00XT518RW
KapitanScarlet- Admin
- Posts : 3293
Join date : 2009-11-16 -
Page 1 of 1
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum