YHVH refuted: once and for all

No one can deny the male is a derivative of the female template (why do men have nipples?). That is scientific fact. No one can deny Women are more genetically complex than men (XX vs. Xy chromosomes). No one can deny men are more prone to a number of diseases, and Women usually outlive men by an average of seven years. No one can deny Women bear the most vital sexual organs. While on the surface, it seems women's bodily functions are similar to those of men, a closer look will reveal vast differences. Of cause, that can't happen if your obvious resentment towards women renders you incapable of objectivity. No one can deny the main hub for emotion and memory formation is usually larger in a woman’s brain. No one can deny Women have a higher pain tolerance than men. No one can deny Women generally have better sensory ability than men. No one can deny that on average, Women are healthier than men of their own age. Science is about discovering truths about our universe which can be tested and verified conclusively. Thus far science has revealed that women are genetically more complicated—and complete—than men, as well as less prone to genetic diseases, have more advanced nervous systems, and so on. This is what the objective facts reveal. That is why good science is so wonderful; it is objective.

Females do not carry ANY genes from their fathers. It seems to be not mentioned too often in the public arena of scientific DNA journalism.

But it's the truth. If I were to make a DNA test to determine my genealogical ancestry no male DNA, not the slightest trace of my male ancestors could be found in me, I inherit NOTHING from my biological father, while males inherit parts of their fathers and mothers DNA.

Correct me if I am wrong but the picture that draws itself to me is that Adam is in all actuality a rib made from Eve's torso rather than the propagated upsidedown version of YHVH.

Think of the inclinations. Men do not pass on DNA, women pass on their X DNA and give men a portion of their genetic X makeup while male ancestors give their Y chromosom only to male offspring whose only function is their sexual predisposition. Males can't leave genetic markers in their female offspring ..this means that the daughter female is not of his lineage (he is part of his mothers genetic lineage) even though he gave the spermatozon. Whoa...weird...init?

Or to put it simple. I have 100% of my mothers genetic data and zero genetic data from my father, hence my fathers speratozon is the proverbial rib that helps my mother to transprt 100% of her data to her lineage. My brother is my mothers lineage and my lineage, but when he is going to have a daughter, that daughter will be his wifes lineage and not related to our genetics.

Maybe that's why the ancients genealogy was traced through the female lineages?

This is not a discussion about the superiority of a gender....only about natures design and the truth of genetic inheritance. As an example: a monk may live abstinent, but he still smells a pussy. 95% of time men think about sex when relating to anything feminine. A woman may think of having sex when seeing a man, but 95 % of our lifetime, we don't...

Add: because men have only one X chromosome, genes cannot be located there. Genes are not on the chromosoms, but on the autosomes. An autosome is a chromosome that is not a sex chromosome.

Genetics Suggest Modern Female Came First

Science may have caught up with the Bible, which says that Adam and Eve are the ancestors of all humans alive today.

But in the scientists’ version, based on DNA analysis, “Adam,” the genetic ancestor of all men living today, and “Eve,” the genetic ancestor of all living women, seem to have lived tens of thousands of years apart.

How could this be?

Peter Underhill and colleagues at Stanford University in California have an explanation. “They had different molecular clocks,” Underhill said in a telephone interview. “Fewer men participated in reproduction than women did.”[/color]

What a idiotic statement. Women don't participate more often in "reproduction", the advantage of women is to have 2 X chromosoms, one is inactivated (the weaker or defect one but science thinks it's coincidence that decides which of the two X is inactiv), while men have only one X chromosom, and if their inherited X is defect, they are genetically predestined to die out quicker.

Tracing Women to Earlier Time

His team, working with top geneticists across the United States, Europe, Israel and Africa, did a genetic analysis of DNA samples from the Y chromosomes of more than 1,000 men from 22 geographic areas and determined that their most recent common ancestor was a man who lived in Africa around 59,000 years ago.

Only men have Y chromosomes and researchers can look at gradual genetic mutations in them to “count” generations.

Other studies have used mitochondrial DNA, which women seem to pass down virtually unchanged from mother to daughter, to show that the genetic “Eve” lived 143,000 years ago.

<Okay>

Mitochondrial DNA (mt-DNA) reveals a person’s mother’s mother’s line.

Mitochondrial DNA is conveyed virtually unchanged from mother to CHILDREN in the mother’s egg without any paternal contribution,

mt-DNA mutates only once every 10,000 years (500 generations)

Y-DNA - This type of DNA describes the paternal line through the father’s father.

Y DNA only contains a couple sex-determining genes and otherwise NOTHING.

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the DNA...... located in organelles called mitochondria

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mitochondrial_DNA

Klick on Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the = DNA and you get directed to =

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA

Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is the DOUBLE HELIX DNA !!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:ADN_animation.gif


"Mitochondrial DNA is conveyed virtually unchanged from mother to CHILDREN in the mother’s egg without any paternal contribution."

Holy Shit! I WAS RIGHT

These fuckers just don't want to spit it out straight as it fucking izzzz..