Space Stuff

re: Apollo 11 interpreted in The Shining by Stanley Kubrik

Friggin' awesome.

Ive watched a good section of this but will continue at another point in opportunity

His observations and speculations on the A 's and date were just a bit too stretched for me , but there are other areas that more than raise an ear, so i am open minded

Personally my thoughts on the moon landing are that , yes they maybe could have got to the moon back in 6os,
but actually orbiting the moon, then using that toy craft to land and take off again then return to earth are much more difficult to accept as the lunar module looked like a piece of baby mechano

On kubrik though , he really has a masterful way of illustrating through film, the complex and overlapping relationship between the perceived social public consciousness and private consciousness of the characters , especially in eyes wide shut which is why i have the eyes wide shut as probably my favourite film for illustration of the revelations of subjective psychological depth as it meets the so called social consciousness bearing in mind there are certain humans that specialise in this subjective psychological depth as it controls peoples motives often without their direct knowledge and Double meaning comes into its own as these people fish for fellow recognition in the expression of the base language of the psyche which is encrypted always

In addition to that, his knowledge and level of symbolic representation (keys into psychological depth ) in his films are extraordinary and can suggest many different interpretations for different people

Actually since you posted this Tg, i really have to watch the Shining again as i have not watched it for about 20 years and i need to refresh my mind of its contents then continue with this code while everything is fresh for more accurate perception to form my own impression , but very intriguing this possibility of the outing of the hidden hoax story behind the film story

It is the radiation that is the issue.
When leaving the earth and returning there was no radiation protection at all built into spacecraft.
While on the moon there was no radiation protection in the craft or in the suits.
The Van Allen radiation belts are highly radioactive.

I went inside the moon lander on display at NASA.
No fucking way that piece of shit took off from the moon and came back to earth and two people could barely fit and move around within the thing.

Yes like that and this one...with the all-impressive space age gold foil...



Many argue that the astronauts did not spend a lot of time passing through the Van Allen radiation belts and that thin aluminum offered protection.
But they never figure the radiation exposure for the entire mission.
And the period of initial moon travel was during a solar maximum period where solar flares were at their greatest cyclic probability.

Now imagine how much lead you would have to line the inside of the rocket capsule leaving earth to protect the astronauts from the Van Allen Radiation belts and all the radiation experienced all along the way to the moon.

Then the amount of lead you would have to line the walls, ceiling and floor of the lander to protect the astronauts while on the moon and for their return trip.

And the lead the spacesuits would need while you were walking on the moon's surface.

That amount of lead needed to protect from deadly levels of radiation would have been too much weight.

Thing is...there was not anything used or installed of any type to shield radiation from the astronauts...at all.

So regardless of all the other conspiracy issues about going to the moon, I just want the one answer that explains the radiation issue.
And wouldn't this lander and all the things from moon missions still be contaminated with radioactivity?

So if one adds up all the constant radiation exposure for the entire mission...that is a lot of radiation.

Some radiation tidbits...
http://ocii.com/~dpwozney/apollo5.htm
r

http://www.spikednation.com/evideo/connected-universe-trailer


Nassim Haramein documentary